Introduction
You don't have to look at too many C. Nicholson's Improved flutes to
realise that there wasn't just one model. Large and small holed
instruments bearing the name seem to have co-existed under the same
name, despite their remarkably different properties. Later
instruments also appear technically different to earlier ones.
This was a very exciting period of development of the 8-key
flute and that alone makes it worth examining.
A classic Clementi & Co
C.Nicholson's Improved (No 315), showing:
A clearly different Clementi & Co C.Nicholson's Improved (No
1403), showing:
To understand what was going on back then, we need first to gather as much
information from extent instruments as we can. Here's a start:
Serial No: |
315 |
1403 |
3904 |
Owner |
Migoya |
McGee |
McGee |
Measurer |
McGee |
McGee |
McGee |
Measured |
Calipers |
Calipers |
Calipers |
|
|
|
|
Company |
Clementi |
Clementi |
Prowse |
Address |
Not Given |
Not Given |
Hanway St |
Date |
|
|
|
Timber |
Cocus |
Cocus |
Cocus |
|
|
|
|
HEADJOINT |
|
|
|
Length |
157 |
157 |
161 |
Emb to bot. |
92.5 |
88 |
100 |
Emb along |
11.4 |
11.3 |
12.3 |
Emb across |
10.4 |
9.9 |
10.3 |
Decorative Combing? |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
|
BARREL |
|
|
|
Length |
65.5 |
65 |
63.7 |
Decorative Combing? |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
|
UPPER BODY |
|
|
|
L
upper tenon |
26.6 |
26.6 |
27 |
L middle |
159.5 |
163 |
159 |
|
|
|
|
Top to C# |
86 |
88 |
86 |
Top to B |
121 |
123.5 |
122 |
Top to A |
155 |
158 |
156 |
|
|
|
|
C# diam |
7 |
6.9 |
7.2 |
B diam |
9.4 |
7.7 |
10 |
A diam |
7.7 |
6.3 |
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
LOWER BODY |
|
|
|
L w/o tenon |
112 |
120.4 |
111.4 |
|
|
|
|
Top to G: |
32 |
31.5 |
31 |
Top to F#: |
62 |
64 |
61 |
Top to E: |
97 |
100 |
97 |
|
|
|
|
G diam |
8.9 |
6.9 |
9 |
F# diam |
10.3 |
7.9 |
10.5 |
E diam |
6.2 |
5.6 |
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
FOOT JOINT |
|
|
|
Overall length: |
153 |
157.5 |
149 |
Top to D hole |
78 |
78 |
76.3 |
Top to C# hole |
112.5 |
115 |
110.5 |
|
|
|
|
OTHER |
|
|
|
Total No. Keys |
8 |
7 |
8 |
Long F key? |
Retrofitted |
No |
Yes |
Key material |
Silver |
Silver |
Silver |
Body Key type |
Saltspoon |
Saltspoon |
Saltspoon |
D# Key Type |
Saltspoon |
Saltspoon |
Saltspoon |
C & C# Key Type |
Pewter
Plug |
Saltspoon |
Pewter
Plugs |
Mounts |
Blocks |
Blocks |
Blocks |
Lip plate |
No |
Yes
(retro) |
Yes |
Indent for LH1 |
Yes |
No |
No |
Indent for R Th. |
Yes |
No |
No |
Sharkskin? |
No |
No |
No |
Flat at RH holes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Points of Interest
Even with just this much information, a few points stand out:
-
3904 has a lot in common with 315 and can probably safely be
regarded as a development of it
-
3904's head is considerably longer than 315's. We might have
expected later flutes to be set higher, not lower.
-
3904's foot is shorter than 315's, helping to reduce flat foot
syndrome
-
1403's holes are much smaller than the other two. They are
still a little larger than other "non-improved" flutes of
the period.
-
1403 is also considerably longer in the body, offset by an
embouchure set lower on the head
-
The decorative combing is gone on 3904
-
Neither flattening or indents appear on the small hole instrument
-
Only the flattening appears on 3904
-
The C and C# keys on 1403 are salt-spoons - very unusual.
Can you help?
If you have access to a C. Nicholson's Improved, I invite you to send
information about it for inclusion in this study. I'll assemble
and present the information as it comes to hand.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to:
Terry Briley, US fluteplayer
Richard Moon, UK fluteplayer
Back to McGee Flutes home
page...
|